Thursday, November 20, 2008

Study: Banning quick-food TV ads could dent corpulence

ATLANTA - A little less "I'm Lovin' It" could place a important dent in the difficulty of babyhood corpulence, suggests a new learn that attempts to amount the outcome of TV quick-food ads.
A bar on such commercials would cut the numeral of fat youthful children close 18 percent, and the integer of overweight older kids beside 14 percent, researchers establish.
They also suggested that ending an advertising expense levy subtraction representing fleet-nutriment restaurants could intend a microscopic reduction in babyhood plumpness.
Some experts condition it's the first nationwide read to display armada-aliment TV commercials be obsessed or in ownership of such a big consequence on boyhood or girlhood tubbiness. A 2006 Institute of Medicine account suggested a bind, but concluded evidence was lacking.
"Our con provides verification of that bond," said memorize co-originator Michael Grossman, an economics professor at City University of New York.
The burn the midnight oil has heavy implications championing the effectiveness of regulating TV advertising, said Lisa Powell, a researcher at the University of Illinois at Chicago's Institute for Health Research and Policy. She was not implicated in the investigation but was known with it.
The portion of U.S. children who are overweight or fat rose steadily from the 1980s until recently, when it leveled away. About a third of American kids are overweight or fleshy, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates.
The causes of childhood chubbiness are concerned, but for years researchers own been pondering the effects of TV advertising. Powell, for case , create quick-nutriment commercials account for as much as 23 percent of the existence-associate ads kids perceive on TV. Others keep estimated children note brisk-food commercials tens of thousands of times a year.
The initial lucubrate is based in bit on some years of regulation examine facts from the late 1990s that affected in-individual interviews with thousands of U.S. families. The researchers also looked at knowing circular locality stations in the 75 largest TV markets, including locally seen abstain-food commercials and the magnitude of viewing audiences.
The researchers second-hand a statistical test that presumes TV ads conduct to grossness but made calculations to speaking other influences such as come or go back and the figure of close by move famished-food restaurants. They also took steps to account for the chance that some children may already have been overweight and inactive regardless of their TV-watching habits.
The study is being published this month in the Journal of Law & Economics. The authors, funded next to a federal give, included Grossman and researchers from Lehigh University and Georgia State University.
The authors stopped short of advocating an advertising ban or eliminating the advertising impost diminution.
Grossman said it's feasible that some families advantage from advertising close to discovery exterior what restaurants are close at hand and what they're serving. "A collection of people wolf deny oneself food in moderate amounts and it doesn't damage their condition," he said.
McDonald's Corp., the heroic diet-food line accountable for the extensively seen "I'm Lovin' It" ad function, referred questions about the study to the National Council of Chain Restaurants. Officials with that organizing could not be reached Wednesday evening.
___
On the Net:
The Journal of Law & Economics: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/jle/contemporary

No comments: